All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Frustration grows over AI-generated workplace proposals requiring extensive human correction

By

theorchid

10d ago· 11 min readenOpinion

Summary

A Hacker News commenter expresses frustration with the proliferation of AI-generated content in the workplace. They describe two recent incidents: their boss (Chief Data and Analytics Officer) submitted a 7-page AI-generated proposal on structuring a semantic layer for dbt models, which contained glaring issues requiring extensive feedback; and a coworker shared another obviously AI-generated 5-page document. The commenter is tired of having to review and fix low-quality AI-generated work from colleagues.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Same. Last week, my boss, Chief Data and Analytics Officer, dumped an AI-generated proposal (~7 pages) on how to structure semantic layer on top of our dbt models.
As the Data Engineering lead, I had to read it and found a few glaring issues; left a lot of comments asking him for details where it's lacking
Yesterday, one of my coworkers (Senior Dir. of Research Ops) shared with me another obviously AI-generated 5 page
Snippet from the RSS feed
programmertote 28 minutes ago | [–]

You might also wanna read