All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Why Treating LLMs as Black-Box Problem Solvers Fails: Lessons from Processing 100 Compliance PDFs

By

Clara Chong

4d ago· 6 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses the author's experience transforming 100 messy compliance PDFs into structured JSON rules. It critiques the common approach of using LLMs as brute-force problem solvers, showing how initial promising results (valid JSON output) hid deeper issues like overly broad rules, missed nuances, and inaccuracies. The author advocates for a more structured, deterministic approach with validation loops around LLM agents rather than treating them as giant black-box problem solvers.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The brute force approach was obvious: give the agent the source text, explain the task, provide examples, and ask it to generate the rules.
At a glance, the output looked fine. The output JSON was valid and matched what I expected.
But as I was manually sampling the results to check for accuracy, the cracks appeared. Some rules were too broad, others were missed. Some rules failed to preserve the nuances of the original text.
Snippet from the RSS feed
How I turned 100 messy pdfs into structured insights by building a deterministic loop around agents

You might also wanna read