All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

SQL's Design Flaws: How Concurrency Bugs Undermine Database Correctness

By

ingve

19d ago· 3 min readenOpinion

Summary

This article critiques SQL and relational database design, arguing that they make it easy to introduce serious concurrency bugs. Using a textbook money-transfer procedure as an example, the author demonstrates how seemingly reasonable SQL code can contain critical bugs related to atomicity, concurrency, and transaction isolation. The article warns against using SQL when correctness is paramount, highlighting fundamental design flaws that can lead to data corruption or money disappearing in production systems.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The design of SQL and relational database systems makes it easy to accidentally introduce serious concurrency bugs.
The code looks completely reasonable, but it has several critical bugs.
First, if this procedure aborts midway through, we might transfer money from Alice's account without transferring any to Bob.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Why you shouldn't use SQL if you care about correctness

You might also wanna read