All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Linux kernel OOM killer discussion: protecting critical processes from memory pressure (2004)

By

[Posted September 28, 2004 by corbet]

6h ago· 2 min readenInsight

Summary

A Linux kernel mailing list email thread from 2004 where Thomas Habets proposes a sysctl mechanism to protect specific processes (like xlock) from being killed by the Out-Of-Memory (OOM) killer. Andries Brouwer responds with an anecdote about an aircraft company that saved fuel costs by carrying less fuel, but this led to planes crashing due to fuel exhaustion — drawing a parallel to the dangers of overly aggressive memory management.

Key quotes

· 2 pulled
How about a sysctl that does "for the love of kbaek, don't ever kill these processes when OOM. If nothing else can be killed, I'd rather you panic"?
An aircraft company discovered that it was cheaper to fly its planes with less fuel on board. The planes wo
Snippet from the RSS feed

You might also wanna read