All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Open Source Project Considers Policy on LLM-Generated Contributions and Bug Reports

By

dropbox_miner

6mo ago· 2 min readenCode

Summary

The article discusses the need for an open-source project (likely runc) to establish a policy on LLM-generated contributions, including pull requests and bug reports. The author expresses a personal opinion against accepting any LLM-generated content, suggesting that LLM-generated issues should be closed as spam, but acknowledges this may not be the consensus among maintainers. The proposal is to document the policy in CONTRIBUTING.md and consider code and issues separately.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
We've seen a slight uptick in pull-requests and bug reports which appear to be LLM-generated, so it's probably about time to come to a decision on what we should and should not accept and document this somewhere (presumably in CONTRIBUTING.md).
My personal opinion is we shouldn't accept anything LLM-generated, but this is probably not the common position of most @opencontainers/runc-maintainers, so we should probably consider LLM-generated code and issues separately.
IMHO, we should close all LLM-generated issues as spam, because even if they are describing real issues the entire issue descrip
Snippet from the RSS feed
We've seen a slight uptick in pull-requests and bug reports which appear to be LLM-generated, so it's probably about time to come to a decision on what we should and should not accept and document ...

You might also wanna read