All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Observability Industry Critique: The Unanswered Question About Data Waste

By

binarylogic

4mo ago· 8 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article is a critical reflection on the observability industry after a decade of experience. The author, who founded Timber.io (which became Vector and was later acquired), expresses disillusionment with observability vendors who prioritize revenue over customer value. The central question that vendors avoid answering is: "How much of your data is waste?" The article argues that observability tools generate massive amounts of unnecessary data, creating financial waste and operational complexity while failing to provide meaningful insights. The author calls for a shift toward more efficient, value-focused observability solutions that prioritize actionable data over data volume.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
After a decade, after hundreds of conversations with teams bleeding money across every major vendor, after hearing firsthand how their vendors strong-armed them instead of helping
The question your observability vendor won't answer: how much of your data is waste?
Observability vendors have a perverse incentive to sell you more data, not less. They profit from your waste.
We've built an industry that celebrates data volume while ignoring data value.
Snippet from the RSS feed
After a decade in observability, I kept bumping into one question no vendor would answer: how much of your data is waste?

You might also wanna read