All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Analysis of Speed and Cost Outcomes in Competitive U.S. Transmission Development

By

by Kent Chandler, Olivia Manzagol

4d ago· 12 min readenInsight

Summary

This article analyzes the impact of competitive transmission solicitations in the U.S. energy sector, following FERC's decision over a decade ago to eliminate incumbent utilities' right of first refusal (ROFR) for building regional transmission lines. The R Street Institute examines speed-to-market and cost outcomes of competitive transmission projects compared to traditional monopoly-led development, assessing whether competitive processes have delivered faster project completion and lower costs for consumers.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Over a decade ago, federal regulators overhauled the way transmission planning is conducted in the United States.
As part of those changes, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) determined it would no longer allow incumbent utilities to possess a right of first refusal (ROFR) to build all transmission traversing their state-determined service territories.
Instead, certain significant regional transmission lines would be subject to competitive solicitations in which both incumbent and non-incumbent developers could submit proposals for inclusion
Snippet from the RSS feed
Over a decade ago, federal regulators overhauled the way transmission planning is conducted in the United States. As part of those changes, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) determined it would no longer allow incumbent utilities to possess

You might also wanna read