All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Why LLMs Are Not a Higher Level of Abstraction in Computing

By

lelanthran

28d ago· 4 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article argues against the popular claim that Large Language Models (LLMs) represent a "higher level of abstraction" in computing. The author contends that LLMs are fundamentally different from traditional programming abstractions (binary → assembly → C → higher-level languages), which are deterministic, composable, and predictable. LLMs, by contrast, are probabilistic, non-deterministic, and lack the composability and predictability that define true abstractions. The piece uses the Alan Perlis quote to illustrate that different representations serve different purposes and are not simply hierarchical.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
A picture is worth 10K words - but only those to describe the picture. Hardly any sets of 10K words can be adequately described with pictures.
I am seeing the claim everywhere online that LLMs are a higher level of abstraction.
Specifically, I am seeing the claim that LLMs are the net step in the abstractions we had, going from programming in binary to programming in assembly to programming in C to program
Snippet from the RSS feed
" A picture is worth 10K words - but only those to describe the picture. Hardly any sets of 10K words can be adequately described with pictures."

You might also wanna read