All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Inside the Doomsday Clock: How Experts Assess Humanity's Existential Threats

By

littlexsparkee

4mo ago· 31 min readenInsight

Summary

The article provides an inside look at the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists and their Doomsday Clock, which was recently set to 85 seconds to midnight - the closest it has ever been to symbolic annihilation. It follows the deliberations of Nobel laureates and nuclear security experts as they assess global threats including nuclear weapons, climate change, biological risks, and disruptive technologies. The piece explores the scientific methodology behind the clock's setting, the emotional weight of the decisions, and humanity's capacity for survival in the face of existential threats.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
On January 27, 2026, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists announced that the clock is now set at 85 seconds to midnight, the closest it has ever been.
A roomful of Nobel laureates and nuclear security experts, some 80 pairs of eyes, gaze out of the expansive windows of a 10th floor University of Chicago conference room, imagining their deaths by nuclear explosion.
Behind closed doors with the experts who study the end of the world—and what they know about humanity's capacity for survival.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Behind closed doors with the experts who study the end of the world—and what they know about humanity’s capacity for survival.

You might also wanna read

Proposed US funding rules would let political appointees override peer review and cancel grants at will

The article discusses proposed changes to US government grant funding rules under the Trump administration, which would shift decision-makin

arstechnica.com·8h ago

Proposed US funding rules would let political appointees override peer review and cancel grants at will

The article discusses proposed changes to US government grant funding rules under the Trump administration, which would shift decision-makin

arstechnica.com·8h ago

Trump administration proposes federal grant overhaul targeting scientific research

The Trump administration, through the Office of Management and Budget, has proposed revising federal grantmaking regulations that would requ

eenews.net·13h ago

Putin invests $26 billion in longevity research including gene therapy, 3D-printed tissue, and cryotherapy

Vladimir Putin has invested at least $26 billion in state-funded longevity research, including gene-therapy drugs to slow cellular aging, 3D

nypost.com·23h ago

OMB Proposal Would Require Political Appointees to Review All Federal Research Grants, Bypassing Peer Review

The OMB has proposed a major rule change for federal financial assistance that would require senior political appointees, rather than career

elizabethginexi.substack.com·1d ago

Putin's $26 billion state initiative pursues longevity through gene therapy, organ printing, and cryotherapy

Vladimir Putin has launched a $26 billion Russian state initiative called "New Health Preser" focused on longevity research, including gene

timesofindia.indiatimes.com·1d ago