All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

The paradox of green philanthropy: A mining billionaire's conservation donations questioned

By

Sara Herschander

12h ago· 14 min readenInsight

Summary

This article explores the paradox of billionaire Tom Kaplan, who donates millions to wildlife conservation through his foundation while simultaneously profiting from mining operations that destroy animal habitats. The author recounts a tense interview with Kaplan where he becomes defensive when questioned about this contradiction. The piece examines the broader issue of "green philanthropy" — wealthy individuals and corporations funding environmental causes while their core business activities cause environmental harm. It raises questions about whether such philanthropy is genuine altruism or a form of reputation laundering, and whether it ultimately does more harm than good by allowing destructive industries to continue operating under a green veneer.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
I asked him about the contradiction between his mining work and his environmental philanthropy. It didn't go well.
He's not alone. A growing number of wealthy individuals and corporations are funding environmental causes while their core businesses cause environmental harm.
The question is whether this kind of philanthropy is genuine altruism or a form of reputation laundering.
When I pressed him on the issue, he became defensive and accused me of not understanding the complexities of the situation.
The uncomfortable truth is that some of the biggest donors to environmental causes are also some of the biggest polluters.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Tom Kaplan's attitude illustrates a common paradox in green giving.

You might also wanna read

Billionaire environmental philanthropy: A critical look at Tom Kaplan's conservation giving and its contradictions

The article critically examines billionaire environmental philanthropy, focusing on Tom Kaplan, who auctioned a Rembrandt drawing for $18 mi

vox.com·18h ago

Miljardenplan voor verduurzaming chemiereus Dow in Terneuzen definitief gestrand

De Nederlandse overheid had een historisch bedrag van maximaal 3,6 miljard euro klaarliggen om chemiereus Dow in Terneuzen te ondersteunen b

buff.ly·8h ago

EU saved €51 billion in 2025 by cutting fossil fuel imports through renewable energy investment

Europe saved an estimated €51 billion in 2025 by reducing fossil fuel imports through increased investment in wind and solar energy, accordi

euronews.com·20h ago

EU saved €51 billion in 2025 by cutting fossil fuel imports through renewable energy investment

Europe saved an estimated €51 billion in 2025 by reducing fossil fuel imports through increased investment in wind and solar energy, accordi

euronews.com·20h ago

Michael and Susan Dell Pledge $6.25 Billion to Fund Investment Accounts for 25 Million Children

Michael and Susan Dell have pledged $6.25 billion to deposit $250 into individual investment accounts for 25 million children, in what appea

nytimes.com·1d ago

California Air Resources Board approves overhaul of cap-and-invest climate program amid criticism

California's Air Resources Board voted 10-3 to approve a major overhaul of the state's cap-and-invest climate program, a decision that will

latimes.com·2d ago