All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Hidden Performance Costs in Programming Languages: Comparing C and Higher-Level Languages

By

surprisetalk

2mo ago· 8 min readenInsight

Summary

The article examines the perception that systems programmers avoid higher-level languages due to hidden performance costs, while arguing that even low-level languages like C have their own hidden overheads. The author explores various hidden costs in programming languages, starting with garbage collector pauses in higher-level languages and contrasting them with performance issues in C. The piece challenges the assumption that C is inherently more predictable or efficient by highlighting how both language types have trade-offs that may not be immediately apparent to developers.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
how can it be that systems programmers shun higher-level languages due to their hidden performance costs when even C has plenty of areas where something expensive can happen without much ceremony or acknowledgement from the language?
I'd say there is a general consensus among programmers that garbage-collected languages are not an option for systems programming.
To answer that question we first need to take a look at some of the hidden costs present in higher-level languages.
Snippet from the RSS feed
One day I was sitting around thinking about performance, when a thought popped into my head – how can it be that systems programmers shun higher-level languages due to their hidden performance costs when even C has plenty of areas where something expensiv

You might also wanna read