All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Grammarly's Expert Review Feature Uses Authors' Names Without Permission, Offers Opt-Out Instead of Apology

By

Sean Hollister

2mo ago· 2 min readenNews

Summary

Grammarly's new 'Expert Review' feature has been using authors' real names without permission to lend credibility to its AI suggestions. The company has responded to backlash by offering an opt-out email option rather than apologizing or removing the feature. The article criticizes Grammarly for appropriating authors' identities and names without consent, highlighting that this affects both well-known authors and regular journalists.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
Grammarly's new 'Expert Review' feature uses our names to give its AI suggestions credibility that they don't deserve.
Grammarly has finally addressed the backlash — but not by apologizing, and not by walking the feature back.
For now, it will graciously give us the chance to opt out.
They did the same to my boss Nilay Patel, my colleagues David Pierce and Tom Warren, and — as Wired initially reported last Wednesday — many authors far more famous than us.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Grammarly has addressed the backlash against it appropriating authors’ names for its Expert Review feature. It will offer an opt-out email.

You might also wanna read