All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Why Fortran may be better than Python for teaching numerical linear algebra fundamentals to engineering students

By

Bostonian

8mo ago· 22 min readenOpinion

Summary

Dr. Jean-Christophe Loiseau argues that Fortran is a better teaching tool than Python for introducing engineering students to the basics of numerical linear algebra and scientific computing. While acknowledging Python's powerful ecosystem (NumPy/SciPy/matplotlib), the author contends that Fortran's simplicity, directness, and lack of abstraction layers help students with limited programming experience understand the fundamental mathematical operations behind linear algebra computations. The article focuses on pedagogical effectiveness rather than performance comparisons.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
This is not a post about which language is the most elegant or which implementation is the fastest (we all know it's Fortran). It's about teaching the basics of scientific computing to engineering students with a limited programming experience.
Yes, the Numpy/Scipy/matplotlib stack is awesome. Yes, you can use numba or jax to speed up your code, or Cython, or even Mojo the latest kid in the block. Or you know what? Use Julia or Rust instead. But that's not the basics and it's beyond the point.
Punched card in 80-column format according to the IBM standard.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Quarto Academic Website Template adapted by Dr. Gang He

You might also wanna read