All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Why Forcing a Bell Curve on College Grades Is Misguided

By

Ray Schroeder

4d ago· 6 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article argues against the practice of grade inflation crackdowns and the notion that too many A's in college classes is a problem. The author contends that well-designed courses with quality rubrics should naturally yield higher grades, and that forcing a bell curve distribution of grades is misguided—more appropriate for manufacturing than education. The piece references Harvard and Yale's recent scrutiny of grade inflation and connects it to broader concerns about AI tools enabling student cheating, pushing back against the idea that high grades necessarily indicate lowered standards.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
It is my long-held belief that striving to have a near-equal number of A's and F's in a college class is a grossly misdirected goal.
This always seemed to me to be better applied to a sorting guideline for assembly-line manufacturing.
If viable, relevant, up-to-date learning outcomes are well assessed, then higher grades on average are commendable.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Much is being said about the impact of artificial intelligence in the hands of students resulting in too many A’s being granted. We are seeing colleges and universities across the country cracking down on grade inflation.

You might also wanna read