All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Examining the Philosophy of Vibe Coding and Programming Language Preferences

By

sramsay

5mo ago· 9 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article is a thoughtful exploration of programming philosophy, contrasting 'vibe coding' (intuitive, flow-state programming) with more structured approaches. The author argues that while vibe coding can be enjoyable and productive, it's not inherently superior to other programming methods. The piece examines why programmers might gravitate toward certain languages or approaches, suggesting that the appeal of 'vibe coding' in languages like C or assembly comes from the satisfaction of working close to the machine and understanding fundamental concepts, rather than just chasing trends or aesthetics.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
First, I don't particularly like vibe coding. I love programming, and I have loved it since I made my first tentative steps with it sometime back in the mid-to-late 90s.
I love programming so much, it always feels like I'm having too much fun for it to count as real work.
Let's get a few things out of the way before I go any further with this seemingly impertinent thought, because it's nowhere near as snarky as it sounds.
Or hell, why not do it in x86 assembly?
Snippet from the RSS feed
Stephen Ramsay

You might also wanna read