All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

ChatGPT 5.5 Pro solves open math problem, raising questions about AI's role in mathematical research

By

Vincent Conitzer

3h ago· 7 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses how ChatGPT 5.5 Pro successfully solved one of the author's open mathematical problems, with colleague Ryan O'Donnell prompting the AI to try proving NP-hardness. While this represents an AI success in mathematics, the author expresses concerns about humans being taken out of the loop in mathematical research, noting that something is still left to be desired despite the breakthrough.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Ryan is an amazing theoretical computer scientist, but doesn't work in the specific area of this problem.
He did suggest to ChatGPT to try to prove NP-hardness (a standard concept in computer science that was one of the two ways likely to resolve the problem) first, because he felt it's likely
something is left to be desired and I think there are real concerns about humans going out of the loop on mathematics (and more).
Snippet from the RSS feed
Again a more serious post that doesn’t actually fit under “AI fails” as much as “AI successes” — though, as we will see, something is left to be desired and I think there are real concerns about humans going out of the loop on mathematics (and more).

You might also wanna read