All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Discussion on Creating a "No-LLM License" to Restrict AI Model Training

By

ahub

3mo ago· 3 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses the concept of creating a "no-LLM license" that would prohibit the use of software in Large Language Model training, similar to existing licenses like the JSON license that restrict usage for specific purposes. The author explores the legal and practical implications of such licenses, comparing them to other restrictive licenses and questioning their enforceability and effectiveness in the context of AI development.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
I look at this pretty similar to licenses that attempt to say something can't be used in some specific way, such as a 'no evil' license.
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the 'Software'), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so...
The question is whether such restrictions would be enforceable and effective in practice.
This raises important questions about software licensing in the age of AI and machine learning.
Snippet from the RSS feed
I look at this pretty similar to licenses that attempt to say something can't be used in some specific way, such as a "no evil" license. Famously, the JSON license:

You might also wanna read