All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Critique of SQL: Examining the Flaws in the Dominant Database Query Language

By

charles_irl

7mo ago· 31 min readenInsight

Summary

The article critiques SQL as the dominant implementation of the relational model, arguing that while the relational model itself is excellent, SQL has fundamental flaws that create significant industry-wide problems. The author contends that SQL's issues go beyond minor inefficiencies and have dramatic downstream effects on data access and database design. The core argument is that replacing SQL or rethinking the boundaries between databases, query languages, and applications could unlock substantial value for the technology industry.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
The relational model is great: But SQL is the only widely-used implementation of the relational model, and it is:
This isn't just a matter of some constant programmer overhead, like SQL queries taking 20% longer to write.
The fact that these issues exist in our dominant model for accessing data has dramatic downstream effects for the entire industry:
The core message that I want people to take away is that there is potentially a huge amount of value to be unlocked by replacing SQL, and more generally in rethinking where and how we draw the lines between databases, query languages and applications.
Snippet from the RSS feed
The relational model is great:

You might also wanna read