All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

A critical analysis of Wayland's 17-year development as an X11 replacement

By

omarroth

2mo ago· 10 min readenOpinion

Summary

This article is a critical post-mortem of Wayland as a display protocol replacement for X11 on Linux. It argues that after 17 years of development, Wayland has been a misallocation of resources that set the Linux desktop back by failing to deliver on key promises, creating fragmentation, and introducing fundamental problems rather than solving them. The author reflects on the engineering pitfalls of greenfield projects and the gap between promises and reality in open-source development.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Wayland has been a broad misdirection and misallocation of time and developer resources at the expense of users.
After 17 years of development, now is a good time to reflect on some of the larger promises that have been made around the development of Wayland as a replacement for the X11 display protocol.
With more migration from other operating systems, the pressure to fix fundamental problems has become more prominent.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Wayland has been a broad misdirection and misallocation of time and developer resources at the expense of users. With more migration from other operating systems, the pressure to fix fundamental problems has become more prominent. After 17 years of develo

You might also wanna read