Critical Analysis of Age Verification Systems and Their Ineffectiveness
By
salutis
Front-window bakery material. Catches the eye, delivers the goods.
Summary
This article critically examines age verification (AV) systems that require strict methods like ID uploads, facial age estimation, credit card checks, or mobile operator verification to prevent minors from accessing adult content online. The piece argues that these systems are fundamentally flawed, ineffective, and create numerous problems including privacy violations, security risks, and implementation challenges. It presents AV as a 'scam' that fails to achieve its stated goals while introducing significant negative consequences for users and platforms alike.
Key quotes
· 4 pulled"Age verification" (AV) is the requirement for online platforms to implement strict methods to verify the age of their users, in order to prevent minors from accessing adult content.
By "strict," we mean methods such as ID uploads, facial age estimation, credit card checks, or mobile operator verification.
At face value, it may sound reasonable — even like a good idea.
However, there are countless problems with it — many of which have been pointed out by credible observers, repeatedly.
You might also wanna read
Age verification for social media bans threatens privacy for all users
Australia's decision to restrict social media access for children under 16 has sparked global debate, with similar proposals being discussed
Illinois HB5511: Privacy Advocates Warn Device-Level Age Verification Poses Security Risks
This article is an open letter opposing Illinois House Bill 5511 (The Children's Social Media Safety Act), arguing that while the bill aims
UK Home Office to use AI facial scanning for age verification of asylum seekers claiming to be minors
The UK Home Office plans to deploy AI facial scanning technology to estimate the age of asylum seekers who claim to be children. In the year
