All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Comparing AI Datacenter Growth to the 2000s Telecoms Crash: Analyzing the Fundamental Differences

By

davedx

5mo ago· 10 min readenInsight

Summary

This article examines whether the current AI datacenter boom is comparable to the 2000s telecoms crash. The author analyzes historical data and finds fundamental differences between the two situations, focusing on actual token demand growth, infrastructure utilization, and capacity constraints. While acknowledging surface-level parallels in infrastructure spending and bubble concerns, the article argues that the underlying economics don't match the 2000s playbook as many assume.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
I keep hearing the AI datacentre boom compared to the 2000s telecoms crash. The parallels seem obvious - billions in infrastructure spending, concerns about overbuilding, warnings of an imminent bubble.
But when I actually ran the numbers, the fundamentals look completely different.
I'm not here to predict whether there will or won't be a crash or correction. I just want to look at whether the comparison to telecoms actually holds up when you examine the history in a bit more detail.
Looking at actual token demand growth, infrastructure utilization, and capacity constraints - the economics don't match the 2000s playbook like people assume
Snippet from the RSS feed
Looking at actual token demand growth, infrastructure utilization, and capacity constraints - the economics don't match the 2000s playbook like people assume

You might also wanna read