All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Commentary: Who is responsible if AI becomes addictive — tech companies or users?

By

Bernd Stahl

20h ago· 4 min readenOpinion

Summary

This commentary explores whether generative AI tools like ChatGPT can be addictive, and who bears responsibility — big tech companies or users. The author notes that while AI addiction is not yet formally recognized medically, heavy chatbot usage shows behavioral patterns associated with addiction. The piece examines the tension between the benefits of AI tools and their potential harms, raising questions about accountability.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
When I talk to my son, an engineering student, and we have a question or disagreement, he immediately turns to ChatGPT as his primary source of information and confirmation.
Generative AI is not formally recognised as addictive right now - the medical evidence is still being gathered.
But there is a significant amount of data showing heavy use of chatbots can lead to behaviour associated with addiction.
Snippet from the RSS feed
There is a significant amount of data showing how heavy use of chatbots can lead to behaviour associated with addiction, says an academic.

You might also wanna read