Choosing Go for a Remote Code Execution Service in a Python-Dominant Environment
By
steinuil
5mo ago· 8 min readenInsight
100/100
Golden Brown
Bagelometer↗
Master baker tier. Every paragraph earns its place on the tray.
Score100TypeanalysisSentimentpositive
Summary
The article discusses the author's experience building a Go service at their workplace, which primarily uses Python. They explain why Go was chosen over other languages like Rust or Nix, citing factors like ease of use, performance advantages over Python, and team familiarity. The project involves creating a remote code execution service where Go's safety features make it suitable for allowing users to execute code on company servers. The content appears to be a technical blog post sharing practical experiences with language selection and implementation decisions in a professional development context.
Key quotes
· 3 pulledI've been tasked (more or less) with building the first Go service at $DAYJOB, which is almost exclusively a Python shop.
Why Go of all languages? Well, some of my coworkers are big fans of the gopher, it's an easy language, it's attached to one of the big companies, and it's much faster than Python.
The project that recently fell onto my lap is basically RCE-as-a-service, and it just so happens that one of the few languages that I would feel comfortable letting users execute remotely on our servers has a Go implementation.
steen's online burrow
