California lawmakers advance $12 billion research bond to offset federal NIH funding delays
By
Sarah Hopkins
Toasted golden, schmeared with insight. Top of the rack.
Summary
California lawmakers advanced a $12 billion research bond (SB 895) proposed by Sen. Scott Wiener to help protect scientific research, jobs, and clinical trials from delays in federal NIH funding. The bond aims to fill gaps caused by federal slowdowns under the Trump administration, as exemplified by Dr. Anita Hargrave's study which received a perfect NIH score but has been waiting over eight months for funding.
Key quotes
· 3 pulledDr. Anita Hargrave's study cleared one of the toughest funding hurdles in medical research: It received a perfect score from the National Institutes of Health
California is now hoping to step in.
UCSF researchers say the bond would help close funding gaps
You might also wanna read
Trump administration proposes federal grant overhaul targeting scientific research
The Trump administration, through the Office of Management and Budget, has proposed revising federal grantmaking regulations that would requ
White House proposes giving political appointees final authority over federal research grants
The White House has proposed new Office of Management and Budget regulations that would give political appointees final approval authority o
NIH Policy Shift Reduces Number of Science Grants While Increasing Individual Award Amounts
The article reveals a significant but quiet policy shift at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) where the agency has been making fewer b
Trump Administration Places Federal Grant Funding Under Political Control
The Trump administration has issued an executive order placing all federal grant funding, including research grants, under political control
arstechnica.com·9mo agoDutch organizations secure €5 billion in Horizon Europe research funding
Dutch organizations participating in the EU's Horizon Europe program have collectively secured €5 billion in European funding for research a
Proposed US funding rules would let political appointees override peer review and cancel grants at will
The article discusses proposed changes to US government grant funding rules under the Trump administration, which would shift decision-makin
arstechnica.com·15h ago