All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Building an AI-Powered Chemistry Tutor: When 98% AI-Generated Code Actually Feels Like 250%

By

brilee

7mo ago· 13 min readenInsight

Summary

The author shares their experience building an AI-powered chemistry tutor over 6 months, revealing that while AI (Claude) wrote 98% of the code by lines, the actual development process involved extensive human intervention, making it feel like 250% AI-generated. The article explores the limitations of simple "vibecoding" and describes how the author co-evolved with AI coding assistants, detailing the complex interplay between human direction and AI execution in software development.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The codebase is roughly 98% AI-generated, but 98% is a highly misleading number.
There has been so much human intervention that it would be more accurate to say that my codebase is 250% AI-generated.
Here are some of the ways in which simple vibecoding has failed me, and how I've coevolved with AI coding assistants over the last six months.
Snippet from the RSS feed
2025-10-12

You might also wanna read