All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Balancing AI Tools: Embracing LLMs for Technical Work While Valuing Authentic Personal Writing

By

ssiddharth

3mo ago· 2 min readenOpinion

Summary

The author expresses a nuanced perspective on AI writing tools, distinguishing between using LLMs for technical work (like coding and documentation) versus using them for personal writing and content creation. The author argues that writing reveals how someone thinks and perceives the world, and outsourcing this to AI undermines the authenticity and value of written content. While embracing LLMs for programming tasks, the author questions the purpose of reading content that someone couldn't be bothered to write themselves.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
For me, writing is the most direct window into how someone thinks, perceives, and groks the world.
Once you outsource that to an LLM, I'm not sure what we're even doing here.
Why should I bother to read something someone else couldn't be bothered to write?
I use LLMs pretty extensively for work. Claude Code has been tearing into my token budget for months now.
I can't imaging writing code by myself again, specially documentation, tests and most scaffolding.
Snippet from the RSS feed
(ai; didn't read)

You might also wanna read