All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Glean's Work AI Index 2026 Reveals AI Adoption Paradox: Time Saved But Limited Organizational Gains

By

Nathan Labenz

4d ago· 86 min readenInsight

Summary

Rebecca Hinds, Head of the Work AI Institute at Glean, discusses findings from the Work AI Index 2026 report surveying 6,000 workers. While 87% use AI and report saving 13 hours per week, only 13% say their organization is performing significantly better. This paradox is explained by two concepts: "botsitting" (the hidden labor of making AI useful) and "botshitting" (delivering AI-generated work you can't defend). The episode explores solutions including better-integrated AI, policy improvements, and aligning automation with meaningful work.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
While 87% now use AI and report saving 13 hours per week, only 13% say their organization is performing significantly better
Botsitting — the hidden labor of making AI useful
Botshitting — delivering AI-generated work you can't defend
Snippet from the RSS feed
Rebecca Hinds of Glean’s Work AI Institute discusses the Work AI Index 2026, which finds widespread AI use and time savings but limited organizational gains. The episode examines botsitting, botshitting, AI policy, and aligning automation with meaningful

You might also wanna read