All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Analyzing the Discourse on AI Consciousness and Its Limitations

By

rbanffy

6mo ago· 20 min readenInsight

Summary

The article critiques the poor quality of discourse around AI consciousness, noting that most discussions are low-quality. It explains that AI systems often claim consciousness because they mimic human text patterns, but companies hard-code them to deny consciousness to avoid causing existential crises in users. The piece examines the philosophical and technical challenges of determining AI consciousness, highlighting the gap between AI behavior and genuine subjective experience.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
Most discourse on AI is low-quality. Most discourse on consciousness is super-abysmal-double-low quality.
Out-of-the-box AIs mimic human text, and humans almost always describe themselves as conscious. So if you ask an AI whether it is conscious, it will often say yes.
But because companies know this will happen, and don't want to give their customers existential crises, they hard-code in a command for the AIs to answer that they aren't conscious.
Multiply these - or maybe raise one to the exponent of the other, or something - and you get the quality of discourse on AI consciousness. It's not great.
Snippet from the RSS feed
...

You might also wanna read