All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Why 1960s technology felt more futuristic than today's gadgets

By

Jonathan Sayers

4h ago· 4 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article argues that modern technology feels less futuristic than 1960s tech because it lacks personality, suffers from uniform design, and is built for disposability rather than longevity. It contrasts the imaginative, character-filled designs of mid-20th century technology (like the Bell Labs Picturephone and the IBM 360) with today's homogenized gadgets, and critiques the planned obsolescence and lack of soul in modern consumer electronics.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
When was the last time you bought a tech product that actually felt futuristic?
Technology doesn't seem as futuristic as it did in the 1960s because there's no personality, everything looks the same, and nothing is made to last.
The Bell Labs Picturephone felt like a glimpse into tomorrow — not because it was practical, but because it was imaginative.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Technology doesn't seem as futuristic as it did in the 1960s because there's no personality, everything looks the same, and nothing is made to last.

You might also wanna read