All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Generative AI's dependence on human labor and creativity challenges its portrayal as inevitable technology

By

Olaitan Mos-Shogbamimu

11h ago· 5 min readenOpinion

Summary

This article argues against the dominant narrative that AI is an inevitable technology society must quickly adopt. Instead, it contends that generative AI is fundamentally dependent on human labor and creativity, as it cannot create original content and relies on data derived from human expression and art. The piece challenges the portrayal of AI as a powerful, futuristic force, suggesting its corporate creators overstate its capabilities.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
There is a consistent narrative today that AI is an inevitability that we must simply accept.
In reality it is the generative AI and its corporate creators that rely on us.
The truth is that AI is fundamentally unable to create.
It rests on the backs of real human expression and art.
Everything that generative AI makes is based off of an endless supply of stolen data and exploited workers.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Generative AI depends on stolen data and exploited workers, here’s why the technology isn’t as powerful as we’re told

You might also wanna read